I know, it’s been a while. But, recent events in the NFL and debates
surrounding those controversies led me back to Dibbles and Bits. If you’re reading, you get a gold star for
sticking with me this long.
On its face, 2012 might be the worst year the NFL
has had in recent memory. Not since the
strike-shortened season in the mid-80s has the “brand” of football looked so
tarnished. First there was the bounty
scandal, a meandering account of hearsay, appeals, and defamation suits. Next the world watched in utter amazement,
shock, and consternation as replacement referees marked off improper yardages,
botched easy calls, and made a general nuisance of themselves. For any professional league, those two events
would be enough to make fans doubt the integrity of the sport not just for the
future, but for the present.
After a fairly tame two months, the deaths of Jovan
Belcher and Jerry Brown due to off-field incidents have started a new round of
debate. The larger debate surrounding
guns in America, needs to be had but need not be explicated too much by yours
truly. My political opinions aside, we
all live in the same society, sports fans and political hacks alike. For that reason, it’s possible and necessary
for the two subjects to sometimes intertwine.
We put ourselves through that ringer every two years with the Olympics
anyway, so before you give Bob Costas a hard time, keep in mind politics
pervades everything, including sports.
But the most recent death of Cowboys practice squad
player Jerry Brown started a new round of questions. The NFL’s off-field image, from bounties to
concussion suits to DUIs, appears to be suffering. Many respected observers looked at Brown’s
death at the hands of a drunk Cowboys player and decided the NFL should so something
to stem the tide of these tragedies. Two
weeks of death and despair can plunge even the best organized outfits into a
tailspin. The questions swirling now
wonder about the gun culture and the “NFL way of life” allegedly reflected in
off-field incidents like those in the past three weeks. These are terrible tragedies that must be
stopped.
Almost everyone can agree with the paragraph
above. Belcher’s murder-suicide and
Brown’s untimely death deserve moments of reflection. Nothing reinforces the preciousness of life
like violent or early death. But, it’s
ironic so many people who pile on Roger Goodell for being tyrannical now want
him to unilaterally “do something” to make these acts stop. Many look to increased suspensions as ways to
dissuade players from making poor choices off the field. The truth remains, however, that the NFL already
has that policy, introduced by the much-maligned Commissioner Goodell in
2007.
Perhaps you want the personal conduct policy to be
more stringent. That’s fair, but the
penalties for breaking that policy are severe.
In five years of enforcement, seven players have been suspended under
its auspices. Only one of those seven
was not charged with a crime in federal court.
One such player, Donte Stallworth, lost the entire 2009 season for a DUI
manslaughter in Florida that killed a pedestrian. In addition to losing that season, he spent
time in jail. Maybe he should have been
kicked out of the league…maybe he should have received the two-year ban Michael
Vick received for dogfighting.
The point remains: the NFL has this policy already
and uses it. Perhaps not enough, but the
policy has always been fairly clear: if the commissioner’s office deems you’re
off-field conduct to be detrimental to the league as a whole, you will lose
money and/or games. We should not start
to question the policy simply based on the timing of two horrific
incidents. Stallworth received a huge punishment
for killing someone while driving drunk…but in the current NFL it seems many
forget those days. That the deceased
this past weekend actually played in the league also contributes to this, but
players know they could lose significant time for poor choices surrounding
alcohol. Josh Brent, the driver in the
crash that killed Brown, knew that. This
is not an NFL problem, it’s an individual player’s problem.
And yet, we as society continue to make excuses for
poor individual choices by NFL players.
When these things happen, fingers are pointed at Goodell, the NFL, the Chiefs,
the Cowboys, etc. Without being
intimately familiar with all the details, blame could be warranted for those
entities. I truly don’t know. But, at its core, the issue remains with NFL
players who make poor decisions. We see
Lindsay Lohan paraded through the news every 8 months with a new problem. She lives the high life like many in the NFL. Yet, I don’t hear anyone blaming her agent or
her studio. The “NFL life” around
alcohol does not look any different from the lives of the rich and famous in
Hollywood. And yet, the NFL “needs to do
something” as Peter King said earlier this week. If that isn’t a double standard for what are
both humans in similar modes of life, I don’t know what is.
Just to repeat, I cannot diminish the shock of these
tragedies. Belcher, a man clearly with his
own personal demons, committed acts that will burn memories for years. Brown lost his life tragically, in the height
of his youth. Like many, I wish the
Cowboys had a car service that night.
But, Brent would have to choose to use it and not drive his own
vehicle. The NFL, for all its power,
cannot guarantee he or any other intoxicated player would do so, short of
banning players from driving personal cars when out.
In the end, the NFL received a bad rep these past
two weeks for events they cannot control or foresee. The tragic events can be used to strengthen
existing policies, but to lay any fault at the NFL’s door strikes me as
misguided. If players are not held
accountable for their off-field choices, the kid glove treatment will continue
as more players make bad choices, which might lead to more deaths. No one wants that.
Bit
#1: Drew Brees needs to shut up
Before starting, I want to make clear I don’t like
Roger Goodell as a commissioner. This
post might challenge that but just want
to have the record straight.
But, Drew Brees has finally hit my breaking
point. He’s been complaining all year
about the commissioner’s office and its handling of Bountygate. This past week, he branded the league offices
as totally lacking credibility with the players after the initial suspensions
to the Saints players were vacated by special mediator Paul Tagliabue. For all the nobleness ensconced in Brees’
emotion, he also lacks credibility.
First, Tagliabue might have vacated the suspensions
but gave clear support to the idea that the Saints had a pay-for-performance
program. The man in charge of it at the
time, Gregg Williams, has admitted as much on numerous occasions. Brees can profess ignorance all he wants, but
seeing as his name has never been associated directly with the bounty pool he
can’t be looked upon as an authority.
That he might be a classy guy easily can color the judgments of others,
but truthfully a dude on offense does not have full insight into how the
defense works. They have separate
programs and facilities during practice, so it’s not a stretch to look at Brees
and say “how much did you really know?”
Of more pressing concern for me, however, is the
continued sour grapes mentality pervading every Brees statement. He sat with NFLPA officials last year for
days working on a new CBA, one that allows the commissioner’s office the role
of disciplinarian and sends appeals back to that same office. That system certainly brings up a conflict of
interest and wouldn’t pass for fair in any “civilized” society, but the players
approved these expanded powers. Brees
may not personally have voted for the agreement, but that doesn’t matter. His peers did, so he should accept that and
move on. Emphasizing the inefficiencies of
a system you help create looks to me like hypocrisy. Especially give the evidence confirmed by
multiple bodies (at this point), Brees should accept that the commissioner has
these powers and, when the new CBA expires, the players can make their voice
heard by going on strike. Until then,
play football, something Bress has not done terribly well recently.
Bit
#2: RGIII Injury
Living in DC, I care more about Robert Griffin’s
health right now than my own. I worry as
much as anyone when he leaves the pocket, since his slight frame and speed can
lead to some bone-jarring collisions.
Haloti Ngata of the Ravens provided one this past Sunday, spraining
Griffin’s knee on a rough hit that momentarily rendered Griffin’s leg a noodle.
Some this week, when talking with me, take Griffin
to task for running up the middle like that and not sliding. I agree with the second point: he needs to
learn that he can slide and potentially draw penalties that way. But, for running up the middle, this was a
game-tying drive in a game with huge playoff implications. Yeah, it might not be the Super Bowl, but for
the Redskins the thought of making the playoffs would drive any FedEx Field fan
to hysterics. If Griffin shouldn’t run
up the middle for a first down on a game-tying drive in an important game, when
should he do it?
On this note, however, the Skins should not start
Griffin against the Browns. I’d put
Cousins in, see how he performs, and then put Griffin in only if the team is
behind by ten or more. It’s not worth
losing him for the Eagles and Cowboys to beat the Browns.
Bit
#3: Laker Woes
Rarely do I take pleasure in watching teams
collapse. But, when the Lakers acquired
Dwight Howard in the offseason, I immediately hoped for them to lose, so much
so that I would prefer the Heat win it all than the Lakers.
Thankfully, my hopes came true. The Lakers, for those not watching TV on a
regular basis, have stunk this year.
They sit at the bottom of the West’s playoff spots right now, already
went through one coach and might be rapidly progressing through another. Mike D’Antoni, a guy whose system never wins
championships, came in with a plan to use the prodigious LA talent in an upbeat
offensive system. But the Lakers are
only 9-11 with a pathetic 2-7 road record.
That won’t cut it for the crown jewel of the NBA, where everyone watches
and wants to play.
The winner in all of this: Stan Van Gundy. The man got his name muddied earlier this
year for his approach to the Magic, but look at Dwight Howard after leaving
Stan’s system? I’ve heard many speculate
that Howard might be a star-killer for his teammates, but it’s amazing to think the Magic made an
NBA Finals and two Eastern Conference championships under Van Gundy. Howard has been nonexistent for Los
Angeles. And, lest we forget, how did the
Magic do it? Defense. Mike D’Antoni should learn by now what gets
you to that upper level.
In my opinion 6'2'' 223 lbs. is not slight.
ReplyDelete